Dan13l_N
Dan13l_N t1_j3lckfg wrote
Reply to What, if at all, is the link between linguistic morphology and the topography of where a given language originated? by Djinn_and_juice
There's a hypothesis that mountainous areas tend to preserve isolate languages better, and languages with complex morphology. Examples are Caucasus and the Himalayas. (Compare some languages in the Himalayas with related Tibetan and Mandarin.)
This doesn't mean these languages were formed there, but the isolation preserved some complex features.
(edit) grammar
Dan13l_N t1_iv0y384 wrote
Reply to comment by iayork in What does it mean to have 2% Neanderthal DNA when all humans presumably share basically 100% of our DNA with them? by The_Imperial_Moose
But how do you know that the whole chapter 7 comes from a different source? What if only one paragraph comes from another source?
Dan13l_N t1_j3qcil0 wrote
Reply to comment by gh333 in What, if at all, is the link between linguistic morphology and the topography of where a given language originated? by Djinn_and_juice
Most peoples connected to sea aren't isolated at all, it's much easier to travel over sea than over land. I don't know the precise statistics, I think it's other way round -- morphologically complex and isolated languages tend to be found in mountain areas. I think J. Nichols is the strongest proponent, she has given examples from Caucasus...