DangerStranger138

DangerStranger138 t1_jao40nu wrote

>^(Officials from several agencies were searching Friday in Williamsburg for Tina Hicks, 45. Williamsburg is a small city of about 5,300 about 100 miles southeast of Lexington.)
>
>^(Whitley County sheriff’s deputies, Williamsburg police and Kentucky State Police were trying to serve Hicks with “multiple outstanding warrants for her arrest,” the sheriff’s office said.)
>
>^(No adult family members were willing to say whether or not Hicks was in the house, the sheriff's office said.)
>
>^(Deputies found Hicks there, and she was served with) ^(two outstanding Whitley County circuit indictment warrants charging her with possession of meth and drug paraphernalia)^(, as well as four other outstanding district court warrants.)
>
>^(The sheriff’s office said the child was visiting family and did not live at the home.)

59

DangerStranger138 OP t1_jaf3eml wrote

Chipmakers don't need to share any profits at all as long as their projections are correct within a certain margin. All this is saying is that companies can't lie and apply for a small margin fab only made possible by government funds, then make mad stacks in reality then leave. As long as the companies are rational and realistic in their applications everyone gets to keep their money.

There should be plenty of companies that apply openly laying out the case for mad profits and they will be able to keep all of it as long as they deliver.

​

https://preview.redd.it/tv72vmit52la1.png?width=891&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=db6036c21ea481e96a473e7838830f378cdb174c

1

DangerStranger138 OP t1_jaf0v0y wrote

>and the money disappears instead of funding semis from America.

That's why the CHIPS Act has defined ROI perimeters on how loans can be used to prevent free hand outs and potentially risk national security if they fail to meet industry standards. lol wtf you can't have your cake and eat it too

−2

DangerStranger138 OP t1_jaey2e6 wrote

NSA May Have Backdoors Built Into Intel And AMD Processors

> ^(Steve Blank)^(, recognised as one of Silicon Valleys leading experts, says that he would be extremely surprised if the American NSA does not have backdoors built into Intel and AMD chips. His reason is that the NSA finds “hacking” through backdoors significantly more simple than trying to crack encryption. For example trying to crack AES 256 bit encryption would require the power of 10 million suns to crack at the current TDP of processors. Steve Blank therefore claims that because cracking encryption is so infeasible the NSA uses hardware level backdoors instead. Steve Blank said that these suspicions arose when he saw the NSA could access Microsoft emails in their pre-encryption state and so he knew there was another way in.)

​

https://preview.redd.it/7sk376bqy1la1.png?width=875&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=b02ee775295ca97aba6e45f0300d14eab2e6058a

0