DiamondsJims

DiamondsJims t1_jadscud wrote

Unless you're a freemason. They will attack and assault you as part of a perverse "non religious" practice. When they want someone to do something, they will leverage their "brothers" to compel your fate.

Freemasons these days are about being above the letter of the law.

0

DiamondsJims t1_ja3l3ed wrote

It sounds like a good idea in general. But, I could see VR causing a lot of bad decisions. I can practically hear some CEO saying "I thought it would be fine" or "the model didn't look like that".

You can easily lose details like acoustic properties, sense of scale, etc.

AR might be better. Harder to do, but worth it.

2

DiamondsJims t1_j9e6uf1 wrote

The best we can do is hope it masters philosophy... And decides not to kill anyone that we wouldn't kill anyway. There are plenty of people that would kill others. War in Ukraine for example. The death penalty in the USA.

AI systems might control our means of survival. I just hope it's not a capitalist scumbag like our business leaders are.

1

DiamondsJims t1_iypayz5 wrote

That's circular in a way. Nuclear weapons are useful for attackcking bases of operation for militaries.

What could make explosives useless?

Something might make war "obsolete" in a twisted, black mirror, twilight zone kind of way.

Did you have anything in mind?

1