DontNotNotReadThis
DontNotNotReadThis OP t1_j51znsp wrote
Reply to comment by Character_Vapor in What is the point of spoiling the plot of a book in its preface?? by DontNotNotReadThis
Yes. Because I don't know how it ends, I intend to read it, and I would have more fun doing so if I didn't already know how it ends.
Anyways, I'm just saying, in a thread literally dedicated to being frustrated about unnecessary book spoilers, it's sort of counterproductive to share the spoilers you personally were frustrated by without marking them as spoilers.
DontNotNotReadThis OP t1_j4ytkmn wrote
Reply to comment by Level_Ad1939 in What is the point of spoiling the plot of a book in its preface?? by DontNotNotReadThis
Homie for the love of God please use spoiler text.
DontNotNotReadThis OP t1_j4xsk52 wrote
Reply to comment by Jack-Campin in What is the point of spoiling the plot of a book in its preface?? by DontNotNotReadThis
Sheesh this take is so pretentious to me. First of all, I'm not reading Crime and Punishment or Ulysses here. I'm not even reading Cormac McCarthy. I wouldn't classify Lonesome Dove as that kind of literature.
More importantly, it seems so silly to me to act like plot isn't an important part of the reading experience. You might be different, but for me it absolutely is. Don't get me wrong, it certainly isn't the only thing and I can still very much enjoy a book if I know how it ends.
But there's a reason the author didn't just state the facts of the plot from the outset when he originally wrote the book. Part of the experience is getting immersed in the world and story of the book and being along for the ride of the characters by not always knowing what's going to happen next. I am now incapable of having the experience of asking certain questions and thinking about this book in a certain way because I know a secret of the story that I wouldn't otherwise have known yet. Does it really make me some kind of philistine to want to experience the natural progression of the story and its mysteries the first time I read it?
The idea that "people who care about plot and intrigue in a book are too stupid to be reading any kind of actual literature" is tragically reductive, and just echoes the kid I knew in elementary school who would always flip to the back of a book he was reading and read the last page, just for the feeling of superiority he got from knowing how the book was going to end.
Submitted by DontNotNotReadThis t3_10fligx in books
DontNotNotReadThis t1_iwwmf98 wrote
Reply to comment by FightinABeaver in Winter Boots (Sorel vs Baffin vs Other)? by FightinABeaver
Interesting. Thanks for the info!
DontNotNotReadThis t1_iwwdszq wrote
Reply to comment by FightinABeaver in Winter Boots (Sorel vs Baffin vs Other)? by FightinABeaver
Are they a good daily wear boot? How heavy are they? How's the traction? Do they keep your feet warm?
DontNotNotReadThis t1_iwtwl7u wrote
Reply to comment by FightinABeaver in Winter Boots (Sorel vs Baffin vs Other)? by FightinABeaver
Have you tried out the boots yet??
DontNotNotReadThis OP t1_j529pn5 wrote
Reply to comment by whittily in What is the point of spoiling the plot of a book in its preface?? by DontNotNotReadThis
I didn't say the book was ruined, only that my experience of reading the book for the first time was unnecessarily detracted from.