Reread my last comment, take the time to understand what I’m saying (emphatically NOT that fossil fuels have a part to play) and then explain to me how wind and solar can take the place of the current fossil fuel used in the furnaces to make steel - not as a fuel, but as an essential part of the process. Hydrogen is pretty much the only answer at this stage. It’s not an either/or, because neither does everything, that’s a ridiculous way to look at it.

There are however a few instances where there’s really not much of a better option (as far as I understand it, I’m very much not an expert!) such as steel production. We’re going to need it as a part of our arsenal to decarbonise, and while it’s not yet a mature green tech, that’s much like solar was 20 years ago (and to a great extent still isn’t. Recycling panels really isn’t a thing yet). This “either or” mentality about electric and hydrogen is counter productive, they both need to work, have functional infrastructure, and get properly developed and deployed in their most appropriate applications.