DoodDoes
DoodDoes OP t1_jeftw01 wrote
Reply to comment by Pitifix in Not you too… by DoodDoes
Its ghost from call of duty mw2
DoodDoes t1_jec4pfa wrote
Reply to Beast: slain by CliffTheAlien
When you say something so annoying I lose Interest
DoodDoes OP t1_je2rfjy wrote
Reply to comment by fearzila in And they were upset by DoodDoes
Thats why “most of human history” is the kids who cant read
DoodDoes t1_jacz6ve wrote
Reply to comment by Ill-Ad-532 in We underestimate how lucky we are for not having taste buds on our anus. by Dor_42
It wasn’t until the invention of flavored condoms that humanity realized god’s beautiful plan for us
DoodDoes t1_irnvo2h wrote
Reply to comment by NarroNow in Quantum philosophy: 4 ways physics will challenge your reality by ADefiniteDescription
I’m not sure if there are holes to poke so much as this is currently a field where unfalsifiable hypotheses are easy (for theoretical physicists) to come up with. I don’t think the probabilistic nature of quantum particles excludes the possibility of either free will existing or not existing. For example: either you placed your chips on the wrong bet in roulette or the ball landed in the wrong slot on the board. Both are based in probability and it’s really impossible to tell if the ball was always going to land there, or if you were always going to put your chips there, or both, or neither. That however is where I would disagree with the “‘you’ aren’t even you” sentiment, because at the very least you were there to observe it. It doesn’t matter that in actuality it’s just a bunch of oxygen and nitrogen atoms moving along a temperature gradient, it’s still the wind. And it doesn’t matter if on a quantum scale you are just a flow of quantum particles that are bottlenecked at what you call a mouth only to be temporarily stored and expelled, you are still you.
I like to think of it like sailing: you can’t control the direction of the wind, but you can move the sails. On a certain level that is not an entirely random event because you are making decisions that will benefit yourself, but on another level even with free will you only reacted to the wind because you knew what to do based on what the wind was doing. Even still I would consider self preservation and altruism to be “proofs” of free will, because in a situation where the two choices are to fight for life or blindly accept death nearly everyone chooses to fight. And if serving yourself was just a probabilistic likelihood then that would be a cascade of factors leading to apparent decision making. Maybe you didn’t have any options other than fight the wind or be swept out to sea, but either way you can still choose to do the Macarena while reciting Shakespeare. And if that’s not free will then it doesn’t matter much, because the universe just so happened to make it likely which is good enough for me
Also I didn’t state the silt, sand, pebbles thing just today, just to say. This must have been copy and pasted from a while back. Iirc the original post was about how quantum particles change what we think
DoodDoes t1_irixcna wrote
Reply to comment by ExactCollege3 in Can an object that’s not a black hole be so dense or massive that it has an event horizon? by ExactCollege3
The Schwarzschild radius would be a good thing to look up to learn about when and why a black hole forms. And the event horizon is basically the point where we have to rely on math rather than observation to be able to tell what’s going on. But the same used to be true for black holes themselves, and the math held up for that
DoodDoes OP t1_jefyxly wrote
Reply to comment by Tall_Toad in Not you too… by DoodDoes
I mean certain things sure, but the stuff that my parents did that I didn’t like I will never do. Ill probably end up doing stuff my sister hated lol