DoubleDot7
DoubleDot7 t1_iyvk0m4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why not use hydrogen and deuterium in fusion reaction rather than tritium and deuterium? by Curious_user4445
Thanks for breaking it down so well!
DoubleDot7 t1_iyvfwfj wrote
Reply to comment by Englandd12 in Why not use hydrogen and deuterium in fusion reaction rather than tritium and deuterium? by Curious_user4445
>it has the highest specific reactivity at lower temperatures
Does that mean that deuterium-tritium reactions need less energy for the reaction to start? Is that because tritium is less stable than the other isotopes?
DoubleDot7 t1_ixxid8i wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in When prehistoric land masses are depicted, what is the accuracy to which they are drawn. Would the maps produced be useful for navigating that world? by TheRealPopcornMaker
That's a great response. One thing to add: sea levels rise and fall over relatively short timescales, geologically speaking, which can greatly affect coastal map shape.
For example, 40,000 years ago, during the last ice age, sea levels were lower. Thus, there was solid land between Siberia and Alaska (Beringia land mass), and the British Isles and the Netherlands. Our current coastal regions were inland regions, and what is now submerged land was once the coast. In some areas, such as southern Africa, this could mean that the coast was several hundred kilometers further out than it is today. Islands such as New Zealand would have been bigger and possibly connected, too.
On the other hand, if sea levels keep rising, we may have to remove parts of Florida, New York, California and many island nations from maps over the coming decades and centuries.
DoubleDot7 t1_j5wuusq wrote
Reply to comment by crazunggoy47 in Why do sample return missions such as OSIRIS-REx use their own reentry vehicles instead of just going to the space station for pickup and return with ISS equipment? by PromptCritical725
Does that mean letting the ground do the breaking for free?