ElectronicDiver2310
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5m9ekx wrote
Reply to comment by teetee34563 in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
It is absolutely valid because it's about data representation. And it depends on purpose of this particular data reforestation. And your (and only your) assumption is that purpose of this particular case is to show that North got more snow then South. And like I pointed out this is not always the case. So you are introducing a big no-no to data representation - - inconsistencies. While country order is always consistent.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5m4tzr wrote
Reply to Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
I am very familiar with vectors in general and gradients in particular. Try to represent 3D gradient on weather map.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5m4he0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
Nope, you are making too many assumptions. Data on the table shows everything. Taking into account how weather models wor and it discrete nature tables or N-Dimensional matrices table are very natural in this area.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5lm06m wrote
Reply to comment by teetee34563 in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
It's normal content -- when you following your portfolio you look at sliding window of particular stock(s) behavior trying to find moment when to sell and when to buy. And does not matter if data represented in a graphical format or as a table.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5ll6ft wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
And it represented it perfectly. And not always northern areas get more snow. So you assumption is incorrect. Are familiar with conception of gradient? Yeah, it's a math conception but it's heavily used in meteorology. Very often days are presented to reflect gradient of something. And sometimes color is used to reflect gradients.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5l29j0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
And stock prices should be ordered by stock price, correct?
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5l24kz wrote
Reply to comment by mckzach in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
And one of them is natural order of recording/creation. Nothing wrong with it. It's called time series.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_iy23t78 wrote
Reply to comment by trail-coffee in Where to get insulin now-ish? by trail-coffee
Like I told in chat I am your neighbor and I have some extra (trying to keep like this).
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_ixrmn87 wrote
Reply to Where to get insulin now-ish? by trail-coffee
Did you get insulin? I've send a chat request yesterday.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_iu1hebh wrote
Reply to comment by rabid_braindeer in What happens if cars are already on the Liberty Bridge at 2 or 6pm when the lanes change? Or is there a system to make sure that never happens? by rabid_braindeer
If I am mistaken, there is a pickup track with cones and person stays on a special step and just put cones behind truck while truck is going slowly. Collection of cones is done in reverse.
ElectronicDiver2310 t1_j5vxrp7 wrote
Reply to comment by teetee34563 in Kristin Emery's snowfall charts ... WTF? by mckzach
It looks like your ability of abstracting is pretty low. 😋 I both cases those are Time series (you cannot represent accumulation without it). In case you have cumulative function, in another it is either simple f(x) =x or average skidding window. So comparison is very fair.