You mean encrypted layers over the normal internet? That is nothing other than a darkweb.

But it could be that users will retreat more and more into something like that. It will be called differently and treated differently, but then one will be network X, the other will be network Y.

>“It’s like black magic,” said Yen Chin Ong, a theoretical physicist at Yangzhou University in China who has a background in mathematics. “Mathematicians are not comfortable working with things where it’s not clear what’s going on.”

Physicists are said to have really developed their own mathematics.

​

As far as I understand it: it is not really about a new hypothesis, but only about interpretation.

I fear, it just doesn't work the other way around. You cannot regulate something that before it comes out.

Thats the point.

I feel so stupid that I never think in that way.

​

But this is just a "firewall" against DNA-Viruses, right?

I basicly think it will basicly lead us to 2 consequences:

1. You can't trust video evidences anymore, because all kind of video can possibily be faked.
   There will be a market for confirmed shots that will consume a lot of effort. But the normal citizen will not have the chance to buy such a device.
2. In entertainment, it's going to be an insane breakthrough. Like AI image generators, there will soon be YouTube videos with people who never existed.

I've heart of this long before and we are still waiting. I guess, the new battery technology is not that easy at all.

​

But it would be great with different manners. For instance, the German Energiewende.

>"Existential risk"

I heart this from Borstrom, tbh.

I don't see why everyone always assumes that a potential AI wants to kill us.

I rather think that the AI is just so far in the future that we can't imagine it.