Finsternis

Finsternis OP t1_j93c7ia wrote

And I've dealt with people like you - condescending assholes who arrogantly judge people who they know absolutely nothing about. Get off your high horse and quit pretending you know anything. You're clearly a moron since you think no one is ever unjustly accused, cops are right 100% of the time, never make mistakes, and the whole justice system works like a flawless, well-oiled machine. Anyone who is accused of anything and objects to it MUST be guilty, right? What a clueless clod you are. And a bitter, miserable person, the type who feels the need to try to make themselves feel important by make sneering comments to strangers for no reason other than to try to make yourself feel better about yourself jn your own mind. I pity you, seriously.

In fact I just talked to my new lawyer and he said I'm right about the whole situation, so suck my balls, moron. You're not "pretty confident", you're wildly overconfident to the point of arrogance.

You know that most people who know you think you're a collassal dick, right?

0

Finsternis OP t1_j8yw4vd wrote

Yeah, you know all about the details of my case, so you're perfectly qualified to have an opinion. The state is never wrong, correct? Anyone charged with anything us always automatically guilty, and anyone who disagrees is even more guilty! You're that guy, the smug ahole who thinks they know everything about everything. Your guess is wrong, douchebag. But I bet that my guess that everybody who knows you thinks you're an arrogant twat js 100% spot on.

0

Finsternis OP t1_j8sfpwy wrote

I never expected anyone to work for free. I paid a hefty sum and so far I estimate he has done a total of maybe two or three hours work on my case. He just has his secretaries handle everything. He certainly has taken no steps at all to improve my case. It's all I can do to get him to even speak to me briefly every six or eight months, and that takes weeks of nagging.

−6

Finsternis OP t1_j8r9itd wrote

I understand, but jn the US we have a constitutional right to a speedy trial, and by Supreme Court precedent as well as the official rules, guidelines, and procedures of the state court system, 2 years is well beyond anyone's definition of "speedy". If it were just one or two continuances for genuine emergencies, maybe, but asking for FOUR continuances, each one the day before the trial and one of them because one of the witnesses has "a business appointment"? Nuh-uh. You're the one taking me to court, you've known the date for months. Your bad scheduling is not my problem. Buy a fucking calendar.

−6