Fmatosqg
Fmatosqg t1_jb1z7h6 wrote
Reply to comment by karnal_chikara in Game Theory's ultimate answer to real world dilemmas: "Generous Tit for Tat" by TryingTruly
You must have the eyesight of a hunting bird
Fmatosqg t1_jazsly0 wrote
Reply to comment by McPhage in Game Theory's ultimate answer to real world dilemmas: "Generous Tit for Tat" by TryingTruly
Nitpicking. After 100 steps they're indistinguishable.
Fmatosqg t1_jaytlmq wrote
Reply to comment by Diaphanouz in Game Theory's ultimate answer to real world dilemmas: "Generous Tit for Tat" by TryingTruly
Doesn't work on phones ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
If I use on portrait I can't read. Landscape won't scroll so I can't see the buttons.
Fmatosqg t1_j2ev9yc wrote
Reply to comment by Ratnix in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
And that's because spending the money in short delay when the necessity arises is too complex and suspicious for the CFO to approve it.
Which is not that complicated when you're working in a small shop and the owner actually understands what the equipment is for.
Fmatosqg t1_j2eu2sl wrote
Reply to comment by Generallybadadvice in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
Insert thrown out the window meme
Fmatosqg t1_j2etg8u wrote
Reply to comment by cleanscotch in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
I hope you can see how stupid this sound.
If you're in a situation where you know you can't reach target EVEN if all the budget is spent, the reasonable thing is NOT dump the extra money into anything so you can save face.
Big companies are a place where logic is not required, and not optional, it's actually undesirable.
Fmatosqg t1_j296lsd wrote
Reply to comment by shumpitostick in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
Because ai is a tool that makes the same kind of output as people but faster. So whatever good or bad things people do on a daily basis, ai does it faster. Which means more of it over the same period of time.
Fmatosqg t1_j29622s wrote
Reply to comment by AndreasRaaskov in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
Thx for putting in the effort and starting such conversations. Internet is a tough place and there is value in your output before you have the experience to write a professional level article.
Fmatosqg t1_iy32qvs wrote
Reply to comment by Nakedatnight in NASA's Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft flies past record distance set by Apollo 13 by EricFromOuterSpace
Exactly, happy to get something close to the moon. Couldn't care less about the exact distance or other meaningless records unrelated to new requirements.
Fmatosqg t1_iy32agk wrote
Reply to comment by liquidpig in NASA's Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft flies past record distance set by Apollo 13 by EricFromOuterSpace
Wait what sub am I in?
Fmatosqg t1_ishmusp wrote
Reply to comment by danby in When it's said 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans, is this referring to only coding DNA or both coding and non-coding DNA combined? by PeanutSalsa
Since all of this is meant to produce proteins, it's only fair that the calculation is biased towards things that make different proteins.
So if a gene/allele gets moved to a different place, it still counts as no difference.
Fmatosqg t1_jb2d3js wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Game Theory's ultimate answer to real world dilemmas: "Generous Tit for Tat" by TryingTruly
Life is too short for that