FormerKarmaKing

FormerKarmaKing t1_ivl1787 wrote

Some historical context that might be helpful prior to watching. Prior to Clinton's victory, these were the recent the Democrat's presidential outcomes:

- 1988: lost by 8% to a low charisma candidate (George H.W. Bush)
- 1984: lost by 18% to a Hollywood actor (Reagan)
- 1980: lost by 9% to same
- 1976: won but by only 2% with an inspiring candidate (Carter) against an incumbent no one voted for in the first place (Ford)
- 1972: lost by 23%

Right or wrong, Americans flat out did not want anything further left than the neo-liberal third way at that point. And campaign managers do not work or win the world of hypothetical human beings.

This doesn't change that Clinton as a person is pretty scummy person (see Hitchen's "No One Left to Lie To") or that he happily sold out the working poor for the sake of his enormous ego.

But no one else in the Dem primaries even came close to Clinton's charisma or had any real chance of winning. And a second term of George H.W. Bush was going to be worse, not better than what Clinton did.

So at the time, this documentary was the story of some really scrappy political operators that finally got the Dems a win. YMMV.

26

FormerKarmaKing t1_iuz2stg wrote

Your recent post history includes getting banned from Grindr, an STD diagnosis, questions about how to travel with cocaine, question about mixing cocaine with SSRIs, and most recent, how to quit benzos.

I wish you the best, truly. But you need to get your life in order before you spend one more second judging others.

7

FormerKarmaKing t1_iriufkv wrote

There are always 23 year olds showing up here thinking shit is just going to work for them and run head-on into one of the most competitive places on earth.

And there's nothing wrong with that. That's part of the game and why NYC is such a knives-sharpening-knives sort of place. If you're a transplant and you're not up for that, you can absolutely be happier someplace else.

16