Fraun_Pollen

Fraun_Pollen t1_j223z8j wrote

Are we though? The technology exists. The distribution channels exist. We just lack the drive to funnel a huge amount of our global gbp into any longterm project for which we won’t see the reward.

Edit: I think you guys are thinking too short term. If you’re going for a generation ship with todays tech, it’s going to be in the scale of thousands of years between stars with non-stop probe resupplies or tricky asteroid mining operations (tricky because they’ll be traveling a percentage of the speed of light). Project Orion or solar sail powered by laser is currently achievable though extremely impractical for interstellar travel

−23

Fraun_Pollen t1_j221a88 wrote

2050 is too early for any radical change imo. The brink will be normalized and a new one set. Trends that are currently happening are deeply entrenched in the current power structure and have literal world’s worth of resources to keep it going. Everything will be a little more advanced but a little worse socially, and the elite will find a way to keep the masses happy and distracted until they start feeling the pain, which will be much later than we will.

−3

Fraun_Pollen t1_iu99c7b wrote

With the amount of untapped resources the continent has, I have no doubt that the African West Coast of the 22nd century will see a similar dramatic climb in power and wealth like China has experienced this century. Hopefully they’ll be able to implement some of our lessons learned with rapid industrialization and implement green fuels, building practices, and sustainable farming early in its growth.

Chinas extensive financial interest in many of these developing nations will also be interesting to follow as Africa grows its own influence.

46