Twitter (the platform) is a technology though. We also have not sanctioned Twitter for hosting Russian sympathizers so this comparison falls apart from the get-go.
The argument is that a platform can't be held responsible for content generated by users, even if those users are themselves reprehensible. Take away this protection, and Swap out ISIS with any other group that might have speech that others object to (LGBTQ+ rights activists, Communist party, US secessionists, garden variety racists, drag show promoters, onlyfans content creators, etc) and you'll see that platforms will be forced to turn off user content or so heavily moderate content that nothing that's even advertiser-unfortunately would be allowed on the platform.
I condemn ISIS, and their message. I do not condemn the medium that ISIS used.
HaikuKnives t1_ja3l93x wrote
Reply to comment by Micheal42 in Twitter argues before Supreme Court that letting ISIS use platform not the same as aiding and abetting terror by do-you-know-the-way9
Twitter (the platform) is a technology though. We also have not sanctioned Twitter for hosting Russian sympathizers so this comparison falls apart from the get-go.