But what matters is the core argument: the AI tech takes from artists and repurposes it for profitable gain.
This is a legal issue, and people are passionate to get it figured out. Nothing wrong with that.
Also the problem of, in the context of sharing professional art, individuals are sharing AI art. And people want that to instead be shared elsewhere. That’s also just something to be worked out in the context.
—
There is a lot more noise.
But just as you are trying to make an argument, it’s good to pay mind to what are the core arguments that make sense and exist for a reason.
—
This is in response to a section in the middle of your post that addresses AI art.
Oh wow, I see what you mean—the focus may be on bringing sound to the canal—and especially the outer regions of the ear are very flexible, so they can be pushed on as collateral while the design aims to facilitate maximum speaker performance.
Some ears are well-suited for oval shapes (and I assume this is currently more cost-effective for machining in manufacturing).
But more often than not, ears match better with a D-shape.
I think it’s just normalized for over-ear cups to often be partially-on-ear cups. Some cups fit over my ears (rectangle ones for me), and I greatly prefer them.
—
(Edit: I wrote this before I saw the other comments about how the cup shape affects the speakers’ ability to transmit into the ear.
Presumably circle, oval, rectangle, and D-shaped cup designs require specific attention to the design for the speakers.)
Yeah but… why aren’t all headphone cups D-shaped?
Hot_Advance3592 t1_jcqvsvf wrote
Reply to Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
I’m listening to history of times and civilizations on YouTube now.
It’s mostly a list of kings and the wars between places, and a few other killings and the results of that.
—
Important of course, but there’s so much more to think about when it comes to telling stories of history, right?
Maybe I could get some direction for more expanded accounts of history?