It does not come due to any problem I have. It creates a desire among the open-minded to discover for themselves if the "problem" is real or agenda driven.

That is one of the consequences of any effort to silence someone. Like I said, he isn't groundbreaking or life changing, though he is interesting. I tried listening to his podcasts, but he hasn't really come up with anything new to make it worth my time. But for the efforts to cancel him, he might be mostly unknown.

I am not opposed to reading them, though it looks like those are kids' books. If I lived in Florida and had kids I would want to know why they were banned and would do the research myself.

It sounds like public backlash renders them wrong? No one should seek to form their own opinion?

I liked his books. He is not groundbreaking, but he has some interesting insights and findings.

He is worth examining yourself, as is every author who gets cancelled or blocked. Whenever there is a movement to silence an author, I try to read what they have to say.