Interesting_Mood_124
Interesting_Mood_124 t1_itxfrr1 wrote
Reply to comment by wow-signal in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Do you think I don’t know the SEP exists?
At the end of the day, I’m just citing the opinion of an expert in the history of philosophy
Interesting_Mood_124 t1_itwm5w1 wrote
Reply to comment by wow-signal in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Well actually no.
The guy who came to speak at my university seminary specifically explained that it’s not dead and ultimately SHOULD replace metaphysics.
Interesting_Mood_124 t1_itwkep0 wrote
Reply to comment by wow-signal in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Really?
At my university we literally had a speaker who was an expert on the history of philosophy and he explained why logical positivism exists and is important
Interesting_Mood_124 t1_itxgayp wrote
Reply to comment by wow-signal in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
You’re just being immature