JCBQ01

JCBQ01 t1_itdgprm wrote

Reply to comment by Few_Carpenter_9185 in Scientists have discovered an ultra-bright phenomenon in the distant universe that could have come from a star destroyed by a black hole. by ananovanews

As I understood it they were using localized frames of reference to get the timings down. But it could be the same effect as to what theoretically happens when two black holes collide that the stars density collided and scraped off some of the holes core. All that I know is they are all confused about it and are excited lol

2

JCBQ01 t1_itdc5yv wrote

Reply to comment by Few_Carpenter_9185 in Scientists have discovered an ultra-bright phenomenon in the distant universe that could have come from a star destroyed by a black hole. by ananovanews

This is true, as such is why im.calling the 'white hole phenomenon' a coronal thing around a black hole we just can't 'see it" because of gravity lensing. But I recall reading that NASA and ESA were stumped that a black hole functionally 'belched' parts of a recently eaten star weeks after they observered it being absorbed (im on mobile so I might need to add the report as an amendment later on.

3

JCBQ01 t1_itcun33 wrote

Reply to comment by Akrizek in Scientists have discovered an ultra-bright phenomenon in the distant universe that could have come from a star destroyed by a black hole. by ananovanews

I recall reading that if you apply quantum physics and Roche limit laws upon enstine theories of gravity warping time, I suspect that white holes are akin to the Coronasphere which, in turn, is similar to what solar stars have and that they can eject mass, like solid tangible mass that's not waveforms. Which would fit the theory and be a possible answer to the question as to why science cannot explain fully why some blackholes will randomly eject mass from beyond its event horizon.

So while not as much as "expansive" as you propose but more... reactive... bubble so to speak

5