I understand the appeal of them from an ease of use perspective: both 'halves' are on one deck which makes transport and alignment (no need because they are always aligned) easier.
Somebody ought to standardize an Alice 2.0 layout with the things I mentioned and it will be a lot better I think.
Yeah, I've seen some pics of layouts without the second 'B'. The second 'B' should have never been a 'feature' on any of them. And yeah, some of those layouts scream "mech hipster"!
Somebody just needs to make an Alice 2.0 layout with the things I mentioned and it will be a lot better I think.
I'm not an expert on Alice variations, but I have seen some without the second 'B', but I think all of them had the '6' on the left side. The bottom rows seem to be different on every one depending on who is making them.
Jazzlike_Spite2458 OP t1_j1us0j8 wrote
Reply to comment by Ashtoruin in Alice Layout seems poorly thought out? by Jazzlike_Spite2458
I understand the appeal of them from an ease of use perspective: both 'halves' are on one deck which makes transport and alignment (no need because they are always aligned) easier.
Somebody ought to standardize an Alice 2.0 layout with the things I mentioned and it will be a lot better I think.