KelpCakeDanny OP t1_iuka4z1 wrote on October 31, 2022 at 11:44 PM Reply to comment by Calion in TIL that the damage on the back of King Tut's skull was due to mishandling of his remains rather than a fatal blow to the head. by KelpCakeDanny I was taught that he was murdered in elementary school but it was common knowledge by 2007 that he wasn't murdered. Permalink Parent 2
KelpCakeDanny OP t1_iuk8tta wrote on October 31, 2022 at 11:34 PM Reply to comment by [deleted] in TIL that the damage on the back of King Tut's skull was due to mishandling of his remains rather than a fatal blow to the head. by KelpCakeDanny I mean, he was the product of his dad and aunt and is a part of a famous incestuous lineage (from my other readings) Permalink Parent 2
TIL that the damage on the back of King Tut's skull was due to mishandling of his remains rather than a fatal blow to the head. biography.com Submitted by KelpCakeDanny t3_yiaycs on October 31, 2022 at 12:42 PM in todayilearned 61 comments 2,752
KelpCakeDanny OP t1_iuka4z1 wrote
Reply to comment by Calion in TIL that the damage on the back of King Tut's skull was due to mishandling of his remains rather than a fatal blow to the head. by KelpCakeDanny
I was taught that he was murdered in elementary school but it was common knowledge by 2007 that he wasn't murdered.