KilgoreTroutPfc

KilgoreTroutPfc t1_jec7qjr wrote

They don’t reject the right to read books. They want to keep certain books away from their kids. They are not asking to have them made illegal by the government to own or read or study academically.

Everybody has SOME books they wouldn’t want their kids reading until they’re old enough. We just draw the line different.

Caveat that these are generalizations and there are always SOME people out there that actually advocate for truly insane things. Pick the worst idea imaginable, someone out there is a proponent of it. But that’s beside the point.

1

KilgoreTroutPfc t1_jd5j830 wrote

You could in theory, but you wouldn’t want to. First you are entirely at the mercy of its random trajectory, sure you could nudge it around, but it’s generally going to be headed into deep space, away from any solar energy source. If you had fusion power you could be okay for energy. But if you wanted to turn it drastically, it would require more energy than it would take to just accelerate a space ship in that direction at the same speed.

The main problem is that even if it happens to be pointed exactly where you want to go, it’s not necessarily going to get you you there faster or more efficiently than just building your own starship.

If the asteroid is going really fast, you’d have to build a ship that catch catch up to it and match its speed. If you have that, you don’t really need the asteroid apart from resourcing mining.

If it’s going as fast as modern rockets currently allows, then riding on it wont get you there faster than just staying in the ship.

It wouldn’t solve any problem except providing a far greater reservoir of resources, and not a very good one. What you really want from fusion energy is hydrogen. It’s not efficient to extract hydrogen from rock.

5

KilgoreTroutPfc t1_j7zfd8e wrote

I’m curious what your opinion is on how CA is possibly going to meet its goals. We want all cars to be electric within a short time window yet our power grid is so outdated that we can’t even handle a heat wave without brownouts when 90% of the cars are still non-electric, meanwhile PG&E is bankrupt and unable to perform the duties expected of it even if this were just the 1990s, let alone some green futuristic scenario…

How can our currently terrible system even meet todays capacity requirement let alone science fiction level ones? Battery technology for off hour storage just isn’t up to snuff right now. There are a lot of interesting solutions but few are actually being implemented.

1

KilgoreTroutPfc t1_j7clb9o wrote

What do you mean by “believe in aliens.”

“Believe in aliens” is generally shorthand for believing that aliens routinely visit Earth and possibly intervene to teach humans fire and how to build pyramids and occasionally probe the rectums of farmhands.

I think you mean, “believe life exists elsewhere in the universe.” That’s the scientific view that statistically there ought to be life elsewhere if only single celled life, but no contact has even been made nor probably ever will.

37