KoastPhire

KoastPhire t1_j2f9vs6 wrote

>You also have $200 million in liabilities, so at this point your net worth has not increased.

It's not about the networth if you read what I typed. It's about having these assets without paying taxes first.

>The good news is that a lot of construction workers, boat builders, and airplane builders have jobs.

So your logic is that they get a pass because $20M of the $200M goes to the worker? Or did you assume the workers get $200M of the spending? Did you factor that the workers for yatchs and planes aren't in the US?

2

KoastPhire t1_j2f4fss wrote

Say I have a start up. Series C funding is valued at 3 billion dollars and I own 1/3. I use my stock to secure a credit line worth $250M at the prime rate, and I go and buy 10 houses, a yatch and a plane. I haven't sold anything, but I have $200 million in assets without paying a single dollar in taxes. Why am I able to access it and spend as if I paid taxes on that? Cherry on top is that the stock is still in my name, if Series D makes my stock value 5x, not only did I spend the money, but I'm worth more.

Explain where is the "fair share" here?

I have more scenarios on how the rich avoid taxes, if you like to engage more.

2

KoastPhire t1_j2eeimp wrote

I'll take you up on this, comrade.

If the only options are "We want Billionaires rich so we can eat the crumbs" or "We want Billionaires poor so we can all suffer" then there is merit in choosing to eat crumbs. We're proposing a third option for Billionaires to still be rich and pay their fair shares of taxes. Why is this a red herring?

2

KoastPhire t1_iyb59ny wrote

It's for any healthcare cost and some selective surgery like lasik that you can pay for with tax free funds. Also depending on your FSA riles the unused money may be lost if you do not spend it all in the calendar year.

1

KoastPhire t1_iyar5i8 wrote

Get your promotion first before you buy. Don't buy in anticipation of getting a job.

Stick to the 20/4/10 rule. 20% down, no more than 4 years finance, and all car relates cost are less than 10% of income.

Let your money that's currently down in the S&P, grow.

0

KoastPhire t1_iy2c9y1 wrote

Without reading the article I think they're saying something like this:

If you invested $100 and it dropped 10% it becomes $90 and if next year it went up 10%, you'll be at $99. Some people would say that is a wash in percentage growth but overall you're down $1.

Timing the market never works so your second best option is to be consistent and invest over time.

2