KoastPhire
KoastPhire t1_j2f4fss wrote
Reply to comment by DrewsBag in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
Say I have a start up. Series C funding is valued at 3 billion dollars and I own 1/3. I use my stock to secure a credit line worth $250M at the prime rate, and I go and buy 10 houses, a yatch and a plane. I haven't sold anything, but I have $200 million in assets without paying a single dollar in taxes. Why am I able to access it and spend as if I paid taxes on that? Cherry on top is that the stock is still in my name, if Series D makes my stock value 5x, not only did I spend the money, but I'm worth more.
Explain where is the "fair share" here?
I have more scenarios on how the rich avoid taxes, if you like to engage more.
KoastPhire t1_j2eeimp wrote
Reply to comment by DrewsBag in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
I'll take you up on this, comrade.
If the only options are "We want Billionaires rich so we can eat the crumbs" or "We want Billionaires poor so we can all suffer" then there is merit in choosing to eat crumbs. We're proposing a third option for Billionaires to still be rich and pay their fair shares of taxes. Why is this a red herring?
KoastPhire t1_j2co4ue wrote
Reply to comment by ChickenEnthusiast in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
No we want the mass populace to be richer and billionaires to pay their fair share of taxes.
KoastPhire t1_j2cnsei wrote
Reply to comment by ChickenEnthusiast in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
No, if anything we lose more. Usually this comes with a recession and job cuts which we are seeing now.
KoastPhire t1_j2cn9ok wrote
Reply to ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
No one gained it, its just "on paper". It works as the same principle as a house. My house when I brought it was 280k, it peaked at 500k so technically on paper I gained 220k. Now it dropped to about 420k and I lost on paper 80k. No one gained the 80k I lost.
KoastPhire t1_j2cmlys wrote
Reply to comment by kendogg in (US) Options to borrow money? by kendogg
Yea, you're need to mortgage your house. No one is giving you 50-100k unsecured, short of pooling 3-5 cash advances on CC.
KoastPhire t1_j2cmgcy wrote
Reply to (US) Options to borrow money? by kendogg
You want unsecured credit line? How much are you looking for?
KoastPhire t1_j2b57j0 wrote
Reply to Can I afford a new home in this market? by Tenmaru45
Your house is already stupid cheap monthly and you're barely getting by being the sole income source...and you're asking if you can afford a new home?
KoastPhire t1_j2avtw4 wrote
Reply to Where to set up an HSA? by Available_Market9123
Mine is part of workplace plan through optum Bank for NY wife and associated bank for me.
Do you have an eligible plan to participate in HSA?
KoastPhire t1_iydyole wrote
Reply to Lender is asking 75% LTV to remove PMI? by Oskeros
It's listed in your documents when you sign it. Typically it's 75%-78% LTV for them to remove it.
KoastPhire t1_iyb59ny wrote
Reply to Should I enroll in a "healthcare FSA"? by Cole-Rex
It's for any healthcare cost and some selective surgery like lasik that you can pay for with tax free funds. Also depending on your FSA riles the unused money may be lost if you do not spend it all in the calendar year.
KoastPhire t1_iyar5i8 wrote
Reply to Buy a car outright or finance? by ederamon
Get your promotion first before you buy. Don't buy in anticipation of getting a job.
Stick to the 20/4/10 rule. 20% down, no more than 4 years finance, and all car relates cost are less than 10% of income.
Let your money that's currently down in the S&P, grow.
KoastPhire t1_iy6q9fh wrote
KoastPhire t1_iy2c9y1 wrote
Reply to Negative compounding returns by HopefulInformation
Without reading the article I think they're saying something like this:
If you invested $100 and it dropped 10% it becomes $90 and if next year it went up 10%, you'll be at $99. Some people would say that is a wash in percentage growth but overall you're down $1.
Timing the market never works so your second best option is to be consistent and invest over time.
KoastPhire t1_j2f9vs6 wrote
Reply to comment by Crepuscular_Oreo in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
>You also have $200 million in liabilities, so at this point your net worth has not increased.
It's not about the networth if you read what I typed. It's about having these assets without paying taxes first.
>The good news is that a lot of construction workers, boat builders, and airplane builders have jobs.
So your logic is that they get a pass because $20M of the $200M goes to the worker? Or did you assume the workers get $200M of the spending? Did you factor that the workers for yatchs and planes aren't in the US?