Landlocked_WaterSimp

Landlocked_WaterSimp t1_jadu59g wrote

To be fair one would need to distinguish better between medical malpractice which CAUSED death and malpractice which failed to prevent death. You don't typically get treatment if you're healthy.

Also - it's not an completely unreasinable interpretation but based on OPs other comments it doesn't seem like medical practice was their focus but that it was indeed about advocating for guns.

1

Landlocked_WaterSimp t1_jadrvsl wrote

Yet i can't recall ever hearing any german complain that they need weapons to defend their rights against the government. Amongst 80+ millions they must exist for sure but they seem extremely rare.

  • As others have stated it's not like regular firearms will be enough to seriously put up a fight against your government if the military is on their side (and if not, you won't need to bring you own guns most likely). Sure it would be better than nothing but you're keeping weapons around which cause many deaths each year for an absolutely minuscule benefit in a hypothetical scenario that is very unlikely to happen.
4

Landlocked_WaterSimp t1_jac3s5u wrote

The article you link states 'Variety of placement and number [of coins], including but not limited to a single coin in the mouth, is characteristic of all periods and places.'.

So it sounds to me like a 'not always in the mouth, not predominantely on the eyes, but anything goes'

Edit: Not saying the title is wrong per se just a bit too decisive IMO.

Further edit: At least according some superficial online search it has been proposed that coins over the eyes could kind of combine the purpose of pay forcthe ferryman and just to keep the eyelids from opening but i didn't find many sources neither in support nor opposition of this theory.

57