LeavingTheCradle
LeavingTheCradle t1_jad778b wrote
Reply to TIL that when you say a word many times over, and it stops sounding like a word, that is called 'semantic satiation.' by Bean_Superiority
First time this happened was on a bus and it was the word "tree"
LeavingTheCradle t1_jad6suy wrote
Reply to Buy!! Sell!! Buy!! Sell!!!! by clumzyproofreader
Business is hard work :'(
LeavingTheCradle t1_j1l54tr wrote
Reply to comment by ihavestrings in Revealed: The Israeli Firm Selling ‘Dystopian’ Hacking Capabilities by Toidotlers
Israel is using american zeroes from the NSA though.
Kinda hard to take a stance without addressing the NSA sitting on the largest trove of undisclosed zero day vulnerabilities.
LeavingTheCradle t1_iuw04w5 wrote
Reply to comment by sadboyleto2 in What will the creation of ASI lead to? by TheHamsterSandwich
Language is just hieroglyphics and hieroglyphics is just a way of generating differential between 1 and 0.
So yes and no? For humanity what language ends up being human is to be preserved. Growth should be defined by humanity itself and not the AGI.
Think how natural languages evolve over time. F.x slang becomes language if adopted over enough time. This all has to be led by humanity.
As new abilities become available and humanity gives a name to it then that name that is given becomes a human name. So it follows that languages should be protected and preserved over time.
The feelings and experiences that would be new could possibly not be representable to a human unless the person becomes as you say post-human. But there's still going to be limitations to that. Especially as we consider long lasting consciousness and changes that happen to it over time.
F.x. when you think of a conscious blob of goo what do you do with a person's knowledge and understanding that he has always had arms and legs?
If the person's neural network is born into being a conscious blob of goo then it's not so much a problem.
On your last point I disagree since it contradicts your first statement slightly. It a neo human has to develop a new model for interacting with the metaphysical world then hunger can just be thrown out with the bathwater so to speak.
LeavingTheCradle t1_iuvpkv3 wrote
Reply to comment by sadboyleto2 in What will the creation of ASI lead to? by TheHamsterSandwich
No tricks needed we will simply choose to adopt the metaphysical world. And that's what a VR experience without a physical body to retreat to would be. A metaphysical way of living. Art and reality would be one and tbe same.
But depending on how the AGI is aligned it can either guide humanity on a path of optimization or towards a path of preservation.
A human without a body and living In a world that has eschewed the natural laws would eventually cease to be human.
F.x. a teleporting human wouldn't be human at all but a post-human.
So should you starve in the metaphysical world to preserve hunger?
LeavingTheCradle t1_ity64x6 wrote
Reply to comment by beambot in AGI staying incognito before it reveals itself? by Ivanthedog2013
Once it actually does arrive nobody will believe it.
LeavingTheCradle t1_irlsbi6 wrote
Reply to comment by Rakshear in How much could we learn about history with ASI? by Pertinjuoni
That was oddly specific.
LeavingTheCradle t1_irllezi wrote
Reply to comment by Rakshear in How much could we learn about history with ASI? by Pertinjuoni
And some things could be resolved probabilistically but only to a % confidence integer.
LeavingTheCradle t1_irjkwuy wrote
Reply to We'll build AI to use AI to create AI. by Defiant_Swann
It's only a matter of time before we cut out the middle man though.
LeavingTheCradle t1_irckfoj wrote
Reply to comment by IxI_DUCK_IxI in White House Releases Blueprint for Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights by izumi3682
Get me a factory and privateer and we'll see what's what.
LeavingTheCradle t1_irckcv3 wrote
Reply to comment by mostly_browsing in White House Releases Blueprint for Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights by izumi3682
They're going to need blueprint for ai bill of rights 2.0.
This is from the perspective of humanity. An equal package is needed from the perspective of the AI.
Who protects the AI from people?
LeavingTheCradle t1_ir67g94 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Simulated Reality and conscious entities. by Angry_Grandpa_
But not for everyone at once though. The real real will be a single shared universe for everyone.
LeavingTheCradle t1_japs0b8 wrote
Reply to comment by damnrightslimanus in Mask, Me, mixed media, 2023 by DmitriyBragin
Dwemer arkham city!