Lets_All_Love_Lain

Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j0vs0nn wrote

>The world is dying because there are too many people on it. Both China and India have over a billion people. The next most populous nation has 330 million. That is almost 3 times as many people. That is my metric. The world needs less people. Logic says you start with the 2 countries with over a billion people.
>
>Where did I imply about killing anyone?

2

Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j0vqsjw wrote

>The world is dying because there are too many people on it. Both China and India have over a billion people. The next most populous nation has 330 million. That is almost 3 times as many people. That is my metric. The world needs less people. Logic says you start with the 2 countries with over a billion people.
>
>
>
>Where did I imply about killing anyone?

2

Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j0vq75p wrote

>The world is dying because there are too many people on it. Both China and India have over a billion people. The next most populous nation has 330 million. That is almost 3 times as many people. That is my metric. The world needs less people. Logic says you start with the 2 countries with over a billion people.

2

Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j0vp29k wrote

Imagine implying that Chinese & Indian people should be killed then getting butthurt when someone points out it would be more productive to kill Americans if you wanted to reduce waste. Good thing it's winter, snowflakes like you melt outside in the summer.

2

Lets_All_Love_Lain t1_j0vkr2n wrote

Why not start with the country that pollutes the most per capita? Killing an American does far more to "save the planet" than killing an Indian or Chinese person does.

3