This is like when Bing was caught stealing Google search results.

https://www.osnews.com/story/24355/google-accuses-bing-of-stealing-its-search-results/

Now Google is the one doing it...

It can analyze software to find features (for example, in the code it can find output functions, input flags, etc...), and output documentation much like how you can ask chatgpt to summarize a book.

Maybe spread biological life to other places. Machines could technically do this, but humans are suited for it already.

They should just have a disclaimer that it is a next-word-predictor, and not an oracle that holds the views of Microsoft or whatever.

With examples like Genghis Khan, I worry that in some circumstances violence is optimal (perhaps if done in secret or in a clever way) as a means of gaining or protecting power, for example. It would be concerning if violence is not actually directly inversely correlated with IQ, but rather a different quality or set of qualities.

So if we augment everyone's IQ to be very high, then do you believe that there will no longer be any violence?

I recommend pc