MachWun

MachWun t1_j15wwi1 wrote

Reply to comment by DeanOnFire in New York State official climate plan calls for Right to Repair by fanopticon

That's only the tip of the iceberg. I am an auto tech there is an organization called nastra that brings all the manufacturers together and gets their scan tool functions able to be put on aftermarket scan tools. Mitsubishi has been out of Nastra compliance for 12 years and Tesla was trying to do the same thing with their Tesla toolbox but got shut down and ended up releasing it for free Mitsubishi is still out of compliance

6

MachWun t1_iu1nvli wrote

Reply to comment by C1V in Young children exploited on OnlyFans, says US agent by charmbrood

Ok, Here.

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/07/cyber/cyberlaw/10law.html

"In addition, the government argued that even if Matthews were a legitimate journalist working on a story, he had no more right under the First Amendment to receive and disseminate illegal images of minors than a reporter would have in buying crack cocaine in pursuit of a story about drugs"

2

MachWun t1_iu1nt08 wrote

Reply to comment by Millenniauld in Young children exploited on OnlyFans, says US agent by charmbrood

Ok fine. Heres some case law of a NEWSPAPER REPORTER reporting on child pornography ONLINE and was subsequently charged for possession. Go fuck yourself.

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/07/cyber/cyberlaw/10law.html

"In addition, the government argued that even if Matthews were a legitimate journalist working on a story, he had no more right under the First Amendment to receive and disseminate illegal images of minors than a reporter would have in buying crack cocaine in pursuit of a story about drugs"

haha love the downvote after you got what you asked for

−6

MachWun t1_itzvel9 wrote

Reply to comment by dudeedud4 in Young children exploited on OnlyFans, says US agent by charmbrood

There have been prior cases, where the person reporting the incident was then charged with possession even though they were doing the right thing by showing authorities

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/07/cyber/cyberlaw/10law.html

"In addition, the government argued that even if Matthews were a legitimate journalist working on a story, he had no more right under the First Amendment to receive and disseminate illegal images of minors than a reporter would have in buying crack cocaine in pursuit of a story about drugs"

Is the NY Times good enough?

−35