My observation is that, in the article written by the original poster, a figure is shown representing "quadrants". Two statements formed the basis and these two statements were further modified by replacing the word "only" with the word "best".
Reading through your post, I see that you may be suggesting a change to this quadrant which would increase the number of types of epistemological scientism from 4 to 9. Your addition of the phrase "most reliable" requires this expansion.
I think you are being quite reasonable here by pointing out that there is a context of knowledge which is driven by the unique circumstances of the owner.
Maestroland t1_je9ck9z wrote
Reply to comment by radiodigm in Scientism Schmientism! Why There Are No Other Ways of Knowing Apart from Science (Broadly Construed) by CartesianClosedCat
My observation is that, in the article written by the original poster, a figure is shown representing "quadrants". Two statements formed the basis and these two statements were further modified by replacing the word "only" with the word "best".
Reading through your post, I see that you may be suggesting a change to this quadrant which would increase the number of types of epistemological scientism from 4 to 9. Your addition of the phrase "most reliable" requires this expansion.
I think you are being quite reasonable here by pointing out that there is a context of knowledge which is driven by the unique circumstances of the owner.