Monotoca
Monotoca t1_iwv9xlo wrote
You were so off on this. On a basic fundamental level, Grindr wasn't even that overvalued compared to the other dating companies. It has impressive growth, revenue, and much potential as the premier LGBT app in a liberalising world.
Plus, a massive redemption rate and a memeable well-known company (Gay sex) means it was a prime candidate for a deSPAC squeeze.
Unrestricted lockups don't mean anything, the owners were never going to dump 150m shares on the opening day - that'd destroy the ticker immediately.
Monotoca t1_iwy2f6s wrote
Reply to comment by MinimumBattle1516 in Don't buy into the Grindr merger - you're just asking to get fucked by fickdichdock
I've already sold a big portion off today, it's price is unsustainable. I'll consider buying in later after it dumps. But to address your points:
So that means Grindr's active base is 16.8% of the total population. 1 in 6. That's a healthy size that still has potential for growth.
Social media and dating apps don't have much competition. Unlike other businesses, quantity > quality. If all the people are on Grindr, you either put up with Grindr's service or go to a better app with no one on it. I doubt anyone can dethrone them as the gay app except Match Group/Bumble.
Why is Grindr Extra a bust from the business perspective? Users may be unhappy, but that's not the core consideration - revenue is. Tinder users are profoundly unhappy too.
Ads have never been a primary revenue source for any dating app. I still see much potential for Grindr, it's one of the only avenues to target messages specifically to LGBT crowds, unlike Tinder, which has a general base. Healthcare ads (e.g. Monkeypox services), queer events, etc. are perfect advertisers.
Goldman Sachs is behind most listings anyway.