MrDangerMan

MrDangerMan t1_jaemqg5 wrote

Yeah and probably what happened is the kid spilled the beans like “but I just saw her in the laundry room, mommy!” And they turned the story it into “hero little child stands up and does the right thing despite the criminality and moral decay of their surroundings. There’s still good in this world!”

5

MrDangerMan t1_iyf7tfy wrote

He committed a minor traffic infraction and was going to get away with it. They couldn’t handle that because it represented a total disregard for their power and authority, so they kicked in his door and beat the shit out of him.

Should people be allowed to just ignore police commands? Of course not. Is this a use of force appropriate to the context? No fucking way. It’s treating a stop sign runner with the same force as someone who just robbed a bank.

It’s absolutely absurd that people parrot the idiotic argument that if the police are justified in apprehending someone they are automatically justified in using any level of force to do so. It’s a position only taken up by cowards and sycophants.

30

MrDangerMan t1_iyf216f wrote

“He got caught RUNNING A STOP SIGN! and when we tried to pull him over, he RAN INSIDE HIS HOUSE! Obviously we had no choice but to kick down his door and beat him to a pulp.”

82

MrDangerMan t1_iybwxe9 wrote

Reply to comment by Battery6512 in [homemade] beef burger by dannydevon

This is the kind of burger an alien would make after long and meticulous study of human burger making habits. Full of delicious details. Almost perfect. But all it takes is one simple slip up and we’re on to you.

25

MrDangerMan t1_itnsncz wrote

Which makes sense in that it would be impossible to maintain the court system if anyone at court got a separate trial to weigh every little infraction occurring during proceedings. So the judge gets to rule on courtroom infractions. But it requires integrity on the part of the judge. That’s why we gotta bust their asses when they abuse their power.

22