Seems like you're telling on yourself here if you're so scared of someone from your past coming forward with allegations like that. The burden of proof is still the same, if there's DNA evidence in a rape case that was unable to be tested for before but now it can be, why should the rapist get to go free just for committing a crime before we had the technology to catch them?
MrStripes t1_irx9udv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Serial ‘jogger rapist’ to be released from Oregon prison by LuceeCarioca
Seems like you're telling on yourself here if you're so scared of someone from your past coming forward with allegations like that. The burden of proof is still the same, if there's DNA evidence in a rape case that was unable to be tested for before but now it can be, why should the rapist get to go free just for committing a crime before we had the technology to catch them?