MuNuKia
MuNuKia t1_ixdarvy wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Code takes data. Codes stores data in computer’s memory, code pulls data, to compute the algorithm, based on user input. Algorithm output is the combination of user input and the data used to build the model.
The biggest bottleneck in analytics is memory. That’s why Hadoop is also becoming a big deal, so an analyst can use the memory of multiple computers at the same time. Which means memory and the data used in memory is an aspect of a machine learning program.
MuNuKia t1_ixd79za wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Ya, updated the comment. However, my point stands. The programmer will setup the code to use the computer’s RAM. When then RAM is updated to build the training data, it’s part of the program.
MuNuKia t1_ixd6l5b wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
The code in the AI has memory. The memory is updated using the copyrighted works. Then the code will call that memory to build a new image.
MuNuKia t1_ixd3nyn wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Yes it does. You are just showing me you don’t know anything about AI.
MuNuKia t1_ixczkro wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Yes it does. Because the machine learning algorithm is only using copyrighted work, to create an output. A human can look at a tree and use that as inspiration. It’s not that hard to comprehend.
MuNuKia t1_ixcyg2h wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
People can also take inspiration from every other object to build artwork. This machine learning, is only using artwork, so the sample size is much smaller for the machine learning, and that means the machine learning has a limited scope to learn about art.
MuNuKia t1_ixcvnjp wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Machine Learning learning requires a training set to build the model. The models used build artwork is still a byproduct from using copying other people’s work. Also there is no comparison of AI learning and people learning new ideas. AI literally has to use copyrighted work to build the query setup by the user. A person is able to think on their own and create new work.
MuNuKia t1_ixcmn06 wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Tell me you know nothing about machine learning, without using the term machine learning.
MuNuKia t1_ixb1xv1 wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Programmers are copying other people’s images to build the AI. That’s the underlying issue.
MuNuKia t1_ixdbns8 wrote
Reply to comment by Fexxvi in This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI by Gari_305
Because the AI code is storing data from the training set, to build the algorithm.