MurlocXYZ
MurlocXYZ OP t1_j8fwzw7 wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in [D] Quality of posts in this sub going down by MurlocXYZ
The posts I'm referring to are typically poorly constructed philosophical arguments on ChatGPT, or just straight up "how does it work". I do not want to gatekeep. I like that ML is hyped and new people are interested. But we have separare threads for beginner questions and/or tutorials, as per this subreddit's About section, specifically to avoid spammy posts.
MurlocXYZ OP t1_j8dknrw wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway2676 in [D] Quality of posts in this sub going down by MurlocXYZ
I have been filtering by Hot, so my experience has been quite different. I guess I should filter by Top more.
MurlocXYZ OP t1_j8bdr4q wrote
Reply to comment by dustintran in [D] Quality of posts in this sub going down by MurlocXYZ
Dang it. I was hoping I can get away with not having a Twitter account
MurlocXYZ t1_jbzk75t wrote
Reply to comment by MinaKovacs in [D] Is anyone trying to just brute force intelligence with enormous model sizes and existing SOTA architectures? Are there technical limitations stopping us? by hebekec256
> A binary computer is nothing more than an abacus
I could say the same thing about the human brain. It's just a complex abacus.