MyActualUserName99
Submitted by MyActualUserName99 t3_11c0wvh in MachineLearning
Submitted by MyActualUserName99 t3_10mmniu in MachineLearning
Submitted by MyActualUserName99 t3_xt80zc in deeplearning
Submitted by MyActualUserName99 t3_xt8025 in MachineLearning
MyActualUserName99 t1_jaes8gh wrote
Reply to [Discussion] Open Source beats Google's AutoML for Time series by fedegarzar
My biggest concerns with this assessment is the lake of dataset diversity. Sure, you can get one method to outperform another on one or two datasets, but to be able to do so across many datasets, all of various sizes, is much much harder.
From what I can tell, the open source StatsForecast was able to outperform BigQuery for an extremely small dataset (Citibike Trips) and one large dataset (Liquor Sales). Granted the much larger dataset, to me, is much more impressive to outperform upon than the smaller. But to make such a definitive conclusion that Open Source is better than commercial would require testing across a plethora of datasets, all of different sizes, domains, etc.