Nafeels

Nafeels t1_jb8u27y wrote

Same! I grew up watching shows like Air Crash Investigation/Mayday and I still study general aviation accidents today as a hobby as well. /u/admiral_cloudberg writes fantastic reports of it and if there’s one thing in common with these accidents it’s human error. Even simple mistakes such as forgetting to extend flaps, weight balance calculations and blocked sensors would often lead to fatal mistakes; which is why pilots are often trained to stay sharp and follow a set of procedures before resorting to their own judgment.

While I love the idea of flying cars as a little avgeek, as an engineer now I’m just hesitant to embrace the idea let alone thinking of ways to implement it with barely any nuisance to the end user.

2

Nafeels t1_ivuzss3 wrote

Microbursts were pretty much an obscure phenomenon at that time, only known by certain scientists and meteorological experts. Only after a microburst took down a Delta L-1011 a couple of years later that microbursts were studied rigorously. Today all modern planes have a system that could predict an incoming microburst.

1

Nafeels t1_irpmvdx wrote

The development for the turbofans throughout history were turbulent for the most part (no pun intended).

For example, the Rolls-Royce RB211 program nearly killed the company trying to achieve the necessary efficiency goals required by the Lockheed TriStar program. They had to bring in a lot of veteran engineers from WWII to figure out the fan blade designs.

2