NarrowSalvo
NarrowSalvo t1_j4k5cr6 wrote
Reply to Norwegian government funds research to find out if white paint is racist by KaptainObvious_
Propoganda from a propoganda site.
Even the Reddit "user" account is a burner throw-away account. It's almost like he knew this was trash...
NarrowSalvo t1_j3kmhij wrote
Reply to comment by lemonadepeachy in FTX attempting to recover millions donated to charities. by imhergod
I was with you until the last sentence. Simple to return?
Even though it averages more than 1 million dollars per charity for more than 100 of them? And they seem to be likely be poorly funded ones like one that tutors in rural India and China? You think a charity like that has 1 million dollars on hand? Or hasn't already spent it a year ago.
It might be "moral" to do so, but that doesn't make it "simple".
NarrowSalvo t1_j083g9e wrote
Reply to comment by Kw5kvb5ebis in San Antonio's 'shit sandwich cop' working as a police officer again, this time in Floresville by Kw5kvb5ebis
Lots of problems here. Aside from the obvious.
Arbitration system is broken. And it always will be. Prospective arbitrators want to be desirable to both sides. So if the PD only fires people for good cause, the arbitrators will still want to reinstate half of them even if none are worthy of it.
NarrowSalvo t1_jcn1uie wrote
Reply to comment by mormagils in Residents’ Right to Be Rude Upheld by Massachusetts Supreme Court by JackFunk
I agree.
Sadly, though, we live in a world where people think that just because something is legal, it is something they SHOULD do. There are whole youtube channels devoted to pushing your rights to annoy people right up to the line, then hiding behind "what I'm doing isn't illegal". (Ok, but you're still an asshole.)
It's also not illegal to mock mentally handicapped people and to call people racial slurs. I feel like we're about 2 minutes away from someone starting a channel to exploit that.