Newkid92

Newkid92 t1_jecr83t wrote

Yes, what is also interesting is that they don't have a backup system uploaded to a cloud of some sort. I'm sure as a big company like that they record for a reason i.e. accidents/ lawsuits. I wonder if a look at past lawsuits/reports could prove otherwise, because this definitely isn't the first derailment.

9

Newkid92 t1_iyb2u57 wrote

Danny Birchfield fought the case all the way up to the Supreme Court. With a vote of 7 – 1, it was determined by the highest federal court that laws requiring people to adhere to a chemical test were unconstitutional (at least without a warrant). Breath tests are still deemed constitutional. The chemical test was deemed unconstitutional because of the level of physical intrusion and the availability of other options.

A total of 13 states made it illegal to refuse a chemical test. The punishments for refusal were just as bad as the consequences for a DUI

4

Newkid92 t1_iyb2ofo wrote

For some reason if you were guilty or not, from what i was told it would be best to refuse the chemical test and make them get a warrant, your license will get suspended at first but you'd appeal that with Penndot. Youd have a good chance of it getting thrown out depending on circumstances. Blood tests in pa are considered unconstitutional

Hey I don't care if i get down voted, id rather people know their rights then to be scared into waving them.

Also alcohol isn't the only thing that will get you a dui, if you are a medical majianua patient and haven't used it in days you will still get a positive blood test even if you were driving sober. So until they change that know your rights peeps.

Update: spelling

1