Noirceuil_182

Noirceuil_182 t1_jegxmx4 wrote

>Both these things are pretty easy fixes so I wasn’t too concerned.

This only applies if you're meeting a 10 year old. At 24 you should be very concerned.

Look, OP, I'm gonna be honest, I just skimmed from this point forward because this post comes up every couple of weeks or so.

THERE IS NO AMOUNT OF LOVE THAT EXCUSES A STANKASS.

How should you put it? Bluntly and directly. "Compassionate" sailed away around the time he was 13 or so.

"Hey, dude, you're a swell guy but your hygiene game is way off. While you have many qualities I find attractive, your lack of hygiene gives me pause. It's bad enough that I would not consider any physical affection for fear of being grossed out.

I hope you can take care of it."

If Stinkor's response is to get butthurt instead of jumping into the nearest shower, he is not a keeper.

8

Noirceuil_182 t1_j29ukd4 wrote

This is entirely too passive. It's more like, "welp, simps are gonna simp..." NO ONE can put anyone else in any "zone."

Only you (generic "you") can control how salty you get if someone you find attractive doesn't want to bang you. I mean, are there shitty people who'd use you out there? Sure! But in this particular instance, you have more of a you problem that will eventually lead you to get dunked on online and get arrested in Romania.

7