Notwhoiwas42
Notwhoiwas42 t1_j2eamm9 wrote
Reply to comment by zeiandren in Website for HOA payments clearly states a $3.25 fee, but has been charging me 3.25%. Is this worth fighting over? by Melodic_Language_890
One reason to do it as an add on fee is if they believe the prices will come back down. Reprinting menus with different prices for what they believe will be temporary is an unnecessary hassle/expense.
Notwhoiwas42 t1_j2ea4at wrote
Reply to comment by UKnowWhoToo in Website for HOA payments clearly states a $3.25 fee, but has been charging me 3.25%. Is this worth fighting over? by Melodic_Language_890
>Those who aren’t making the “cost of business” more expensive since they’re paying by cash/check get to also pay a smaller amount.
Except that the entity receiving payment has higher costs in processing and accounting for cash/check payments that they do on funds received electronically.
Notwhoiwas42 t1_j2e9osl wrote
Reply to comment by themoslucius in Website for HOA payments clearly states a $3.25 fee, but has been charging me 3.25%. Is this worth fighting over? by Melodic_Language_890
The really funny thing is that it costs them a LOT more in labor to process a physical check that it would an electronic payment.
Notwhoiwas42 t1_iuah57h wrote
Reply to comment by LuckyEmoKid in Plumbing Advice - Toilet Draining to a 2" Line by [deleted]
>who don't understand physics and shit.
Or in this case the physics OF shit.
Notwhoiwas42 t1_j2eaxpj wrote
Reply to comment by TacoNomad in Website for HOA payments clearly states a $3.25 fee, but has been charging me 3.25%. Is this worth fighting over? by Melodic_Language_890
In many states if the goods or service is essential they are required to offer a free way to pay. Ironically the free way often costs the recipient more to process than the card processing fees would.