If you're into general intelligence / superintelligence / etc. critiques as well I have some recommendations.
I just picked up Why machines will never rule the world by Jobst Langrebe and Berry Smith. It's not a critique of concrete ML, but rather of the idea that we'll ever create General Intelligence in a machine. They base it on a broad verity of fields, including linguistics, philosophy, biology, and physics. I read an interview where Jobst accuses people in the ML field of being one-eyed, thinking everything is doable based on Turing and Gödel. Being a CS-guy I found that I probably have that bias, so I have to read it.
I also found Maciej Ceglowski's talk interesting. It's a bit old, but he's an amazing presenter, and I don't think "the top of our industry" which his critique is targeting, has changed all that much.
OdinsHammer t1_irxe655 wrote
Reply to [D] Looking for some critiques on recent development of machine learning by fromnighttilldawn
If you're into general intelligence / superintelligence / etc. critiques as well I have some recommendations.
I just picked up Why machines will never rule the world by Jobst Langrebe and Berry Smith. It's not a critique of concrete ML, but rather of the idea that we'll ever create General Intelligence in a machine. They base it on a broad verity of fields, including linguistics, philosophy, biology, and physics. I read an interview where Jobst accuses people in the ML field of being one-eyed, thinking everything is doable based on Turing and Gödel. Being a CS-guy I found that I probably have that bias, so I have to read it.
I also found Maciej Ceglowski's talk interesting. It's a bit old, but he's an amazing presenter, and I don't think "the top of our industry" which his critique is targeting, has changed all that much.