Ooops2278
Ooops2278 t1_j6fjea2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in German chancellor says he won't send fighter jets to Ukraine by El-JJ
>Wasn't the same said about large weapons ? Then heavy weapon and vehicles, then mid range artilery, then longer range artilery, then tanks ...
No, there was a single line about only sending anything as part as a coordinated NATO decision. Everything else is media bullshit you ate up.
>Somehow i don't believe this anymore
Wait? You plan to stop believing every propaganda narrative you read?
>Then we will see all countries all of the sudden sending jets at the same time again.
Oh... of course, you will stop to believe any actual statement because propaganda is just so tasty and addictive... while did I suspect anything else?
Ooops2278 t1_j6fim0r wrote
Reply to comment by dogeimistic in German chancellor says he won't send fighter jets to Ukraine by El-JJ
No, Germany has exactly one single like "we will not send anything unless as part of a coordinated NATO decision". Everything else you made up by gobbling up propaganda and lying to yourself.
Which also includes this statement about jets that simply doesn't exist (the actual answer when asked about jets was btw: There's no discussion in Germany about jets at the moment... followed by how we should look after delivering the promised tanks right now, instead of making up a narrative about the next demand just a day after that announcement...).
Ooops2278 t1_j40pzbq wrote
Reply to comment by Fishydeals in Germany exported more electricity to its neighbours than it imported in 2022, even with an energy crisis at home, thanks to more weather-driven renewable power and greater demand from France by green_flash
You forgot cursing the stupid Germans for ruining energy prices with their gas dependency, while they export electricity not produced by gas to countries running their electric grid on up to 50% gas.
Ooops2278 t1_ix8ia58 wrote
Reply to comment by glisteningdinkus in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
From OPs question you answered?
His numbers and the premise of his question simply being wrong is indeed an answer.
Ooops2278 t1_ix8hxgk wrote
Reply to comment by Czl2 in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
Still doesn't work. If the observable parts expanded with the universe then the whole distance the light had to travel expanded. Either that expansion happens with less than light speed and the distance is impossible or it expands faster and the light wouldn't reach us.
Ooops2278 t1_ix799i0 wrote
Reply to comment by Czl2 in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
But if the universe's "surface" is expanding faster than light how do I observer something?
Ooops2278 t1_ix78h92 wrote
Reply to comment by tigojones in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
>and this expansion isn't bound by the "nothing can travel faster than light", because that only applies to things inside the universe
But what about the light inside the universe? How did it reach us from 83 billion light years away in under 13 billion years since the big bang?
Ooops2278 t1_ix788pq wrote
Reply to comment by glisteningdinkus in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
That only answers one problem. Even if space itselfs expands much faster, how do we observe something 83 billion light years away if there are no 83 billion years for the light to travel?
Ooops2278 t1_ix7805x wrote
Reply to comment by magnamed in Someone tell me how the Big Bang began 13 billion years ago, yet the *observable* universe is 83 billion light years apart? by novacks0001
The original question is about a perceived contradiction. Or actually two...
-
How can the universe have expanded faster than light? Then the answer that it expanded in different direction at the same time is not helpful as that indeed would limit it to 2 times lightspeed in opposing directions.
-
How can we observe something 83 billion years away when the light did not have time to reach us in only 13 billion years? Which leads to the exact same problem when we assume light speed to be a cap. When we observe it now it must have been 13 billion light years away back then but moved (relative to our position) another 70 billion light years away since then.
So any answer about the expansion of the universe without addressing light speed is not helpful.
Ooops2278 t1_ja4uix0 wrote
Reply to German minister warns of ‘massive’ danger from Russian hackers | Nancy Faeser says Ukraine war has exacerbated German cybersecurity concerns by misana123
And coming from anybody else that would be a fair warning.
But Nancy Faeser -as it seems to be a basic qualification for that job- is a total and utter nutjob only looking at another topic to exploit as a "totally legit" reason to implement wide-spread surveilance of people's online activities.