Thanks for embellishing. Your position in this is the only thing I could think of to make it viable. When I posted the reply, I had just woken up & didn't make a good response. I was a little shallow, sorry for that.

My point is that if you have easy access to something (time included), then you wouldn't pay someone else to do it unless there was value doing so. I can also drive my own car, pick up my own food, & so on, but there is value in saving time, which is the only thing I can see as valuable for op to do because interacting with the ai also takes some skill for better results.

People buy grocery from grocery stores because they can't buy directly from the producers, so when it comes to ai, why would they pay you when they could get access cheaper, or especially when it's not even hard for you to do it yourself. Capitalisms about capitalizing the barriers to access. GL out there providing minimal edge case services.

There are a lot of good responses & I really liked this one.

People who support this verbally or work for them don't deserve support themselves.

Someone I know who does business in China says everyone he knows is moving business to Vietnam from China.

When people's lives are on the line they act accordingly. The politicians know this that's why they're laughing at you

Talk about missing the point of the original commenter's statement. I'm sorry to hear about your mental condition.