Poncho_au
Poncho_au t1_j9fff22 wrote
Reply to comment by VintageChemistry in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
It’s fundamentally impossible they’ll be the #1 carried carrier globally. That’s due to physics. A wireless communication medium cannot be even competitive in comparison to a fibre optic communication medium so in high population density areas that fibre makes sense they’ll have low customer counts.
In rural areas though they could absolutely become the #1 ISP.
Poncho_au t1_j4uvrsl wrote
Reply to comment by deeeznotes in ChatGPT won't kill Google, it will help it. Generative AI's biggest impact will be on office apps, not search engines. by cartoonzi
It an openai.com website. It’ll be probably your first link in google.
Poncho_au t1_j2vvayf wrote
Reply to comment by Mikeyme1998 in IAMA Canadian Avionics Technician, specializing in line maintenance and Garmin flight deck installations on a number of different airframes. Please, ask me anything! by Mikeyme1998
5G (in cellular communications) definitely doesn’t stand for “5 gigahertz” it stands for “5th generation”. I’m pretty sure 5G doesn’t even use any frequency in the 5 gigahertz range globally.
Source re the frequency usage: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_NR_frequency_bands
Poncho_au t1_j2vtorn wrote
Reply to comment by twojs1b in IAMA Canadian Avionics Technician, specializing in line maintenance and Garmin flight deck installations on a number of different airframes. Please, ask me anything! by Mikeyme1998
Aren’t most airlines globally now allowing Bluetooth and WiFi inflight? They are in Australia.
I think the historic reasons for technology off inflight was a near entirely unfounded fear of interference.
The reasons for putting certain devices away during takeoff and landing is the risk of flying objects.
The reason airplane mode is still mandated on flights to my understanding is because of the likelihood that people will start taking calls and being even more annoying during flights.
Poncho_au t1_jeh4j7r wrote
Reply to comment by skedeebs in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
It doesn’t really make a lot of sense. The amount of lithium batteries ready for recycling vs the demand for lithium is likely low single digit percentages and almost certainly will stay that way for the foreseeable future.