Puffin_fan

Puffin_fan t1_je0xgi7 wrote

It entirely depends on the form of "physical exercise".

Specific exercise has to be tested.

Start with full on wilderness adventures.

And require the participants to do their own navigation with compasses, bring their own flashlights, maintain their own water supplies [ and water purification].

And take their own precautions against ice slide outs and lightning.

And maybe even be obliged to do part care for the alpacas and goats.

6

Puffin_fan t1_j5qikc7 wrote

Hi. Thanks. The answer of non - 3 D symmetry could be quite wrong, under a few circumstances:

(1) Enforced symmetries due to Standard Model extensions to black and white holes

(2) And [ very similar if not the same ] the outcome of General Relativity for rotating black holes [ or white holes ].

The questions about how to account for rotational momentum for the Standard Model when merged with General Relativity singularities is something that probably should be left to expert mathematicians. { : < }

7

Puffin_fan t1_j5q59yn wrote

Just a very brief thought.

Not sure if the author means "spherical" vs round [ in other words, symmetric in 2 dimensions ]

Probably spherical [ symmetric in 3 dimensions ].

The event horizon has to be non - symmetric [ imho ] since attraction of mass occurs in a non - symmetric space and with a non - symmetric distribution of matter.

Galaxies [ where many black holes occur ] are non -symmetric by mass distribution. [ another poster is welcome to differ, however ]

16

Puffin_fan t1_j0wfx3r wrote

UBI is necessary.

AI is nothing but a scam.

Here is a fairly simple example. Take a look at the most critical problems the planet faces. Global warming. Damage to the oceans. The growth of monopolies via the state.

Now, will AI help with any of those ? No, and the fact is, as operating systems and IT monopolies increase in size, those problems worsen.

1