Pyramid_Jumper
Pyramid_Jumper t1_j8cuxdp wrote
Reply to [D] Is a non-SOTA paper still good to publish if it has an interesting method that does have strong improvements over baselines (read text for more context)? Are there good examples of this kind of work being published? by orangelord234
Yes, of course. If the research is novel and you believe that the methods are interesting and/or of value then you should definitely seek publication. The goal of research is not to develop SoTA models, but to expand our knowledge in a particular area.
Yes, developing a SoTA method is a great way of getting published, but laying the groundwork for other methods and exploring ideas are all crucial parts of ML research too.
Pyramid_Jumper t1_j9ayed5 wrote
Reply to [D] Something basic I don't understand about Nerfs by alik31239
Been a while since I’ve read the paper but I don’t think you’re missing anything - apart from data in the correct format that is. You’ll need the aforementioned 5D vectors to be able to train/use this model.
If you can’t get that data then I’d suggest you look at other work that cite NeRF that maybe have data in a similar format to the data you do have