Randommaggy

Randommaggy t1_j8oi1yp wrote

How is a genetic algorithm that optimizes for a set of constraints fundamentally different from a GAN or reinforcement learning model except in implementation details and resource-efficiency?
The discriminative network in a GAN is the provider of constraints aka part of the training dataset or the measurer of fitness.
The generative network proposes solutions and refines it's weights based on the fitness of the output.

There are differences but the premise is more similar than dissimilar.

Your funding would also likely be better if you could convince people that it is a form of AI maybe branded as a subcategory of supervised reinforcement learning.

1

Randommaggy t1_j8ohpv5 wrote

Where is the intelligence in the glorified inverted indexes with result blending bolted to them that are paraded about these days?
Inventing authors and papers that sound plausible when asked for citations is a strong indication that the smoke and mirrors make people ascribe a lot of intelligence that is simply not there.

0

Randommaggy t1_j0liml3 wrote

Its not even a practical nailgun its an impractical one with a heavy V12 engine that needs specialized skills to wield without taking of a leg or killing your neighbors.

Its also tempting for people that does not understand the subject they are applying it to.

10