Resident_Bitch
Resident_Bitch t1_j2c26vk wrote
Reply to comment by Papaofmonsters in was django an abolitionist? or only in it for broomhilda? by [deleted]
Schulz did have a problem with owning Django though. He did it anyway because he needed the information Django had, but he specifically stated that he had a problem with it when they were drinking beer and waiting for the sheriff.
Resident_Bitch t1_j2cbxtd wrote
Reply to comment by Papaofmonsters in was django an abolitionist? or only in it for broomhilda? by [deleted]
I don’t think it’s really fair to call Schulz a hypocrite. Yes, he was willing to “own Django for his own personal profit” but I think that the “for the time being” part of that quote makes it pretty clear that his intent was to free Django.