Riptide360

Riptide360 t1_jdaljtf wrote

Remember how many decades it took us to build a replacement for Skylab?

Remember how many decades it took us to build a replacement for the Space Shuttle?

The discussion on saving the ISS as a resource is useful. Lets hope most of it can be saved or it'll be decades more.

Feel free to stop participating if you don't have anything meaningful to add.

0

Riptide360 t1_jdajrhs wrote

Maintaining ISS runs about $3 billion a year. Getting that much gear up there cost $150 billion. The tug boat NASA is building for $80 million could just as easily push up as it does down. NASA wants chunks of it brought down like we did with SkyLab, albeit a little bit more controlled this time, but a hell of a lot larger.

0

Riptide360 t1_jd3atwo wrote

That is way too much to pin on any one person to fix. The decades of declining birth rate is front and center Japan’s number one problem. No point in arguing about the return of the Kuril islands if both Japan and Russia are both losing population each year. https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Japan-s-successes-in-boosting-birthrates-should-not-be-overlooked

12

Riptide360 t1_jadduch wrote

Reply to comment by Clumbum in Crushed bales of aluminium cans by Clumbum

People would pay for movie prop sodas! You might be onto a biz idea! There should be a film brand that gives free license and product for shows and sells to consumers with proceeds going to the actor’s guild.

2