That quote is unreadable.

Bet I could ask chatgpt to improve it though lol

Counter point: markets that are small and specialised and require tons of domain knowledge. E.g. training the model on israeli law in hebrew.

I think you might have misunderstood me.

I do like the sculptures themselves quite a bit!

But with the striking lighting the pieces look like pieces I could see hanging in my room, which is very rare. I like my walls blank and cold.

Seconds before opening reddit i had the idea to try to create impasto depth maps from photos / diffusion model outputs.

What I came to in the few seconds of given thought was pretty close to the additive approach as far as I can tell.

Unfortunately I don't know the first thing about painting so I'll never implement that.

I'm much more impressed by the rendering of the sculptures (lighting & angles & compositions) than by the statues themselves tbh.

Not that the idea itself isn't also really cool though.

Yeah, true lol

Python errors are mostly good enough.

If you add "be as concise as possible" it cuts out a lot of the noise. But that is annoying to add everytime. But you can say thanks to the great retention "for all following answers be as concise as possible". All we need now is a a .chatgptrc file to add all the "global" prompts we want lol

No. The whole chatgpt/gpt-3.5 model builds on code-davinci-002 (which is maybe the one tuned for copilot, but I don't think this has been said publicly).

So amy prompt to chatgpt is a prompt to a differently fine-tuned version of copilot (or copilot-like).

I was about to write "neither title nor abstract manage to 1-shot communicate their ideas or research to me" but it felt mean so I didn't. Also haven't read the paper yet.

That's quite funny.

> It made me fearful of losing my free will

Neuroscience be like: welp, you can't loose what you don't have.

I don't know why exactly but this made me laugh out loud

Fathom by fathom you will not have an anthem