does ai art count?

Are any of those actually more important than Obama tho?

Used to be pharaohs, sultans, emperors, patriarchs, judges and others as well

So the theory with the most confidence was that it was a lab leak.

Then it comes down to which sources of evidence the intel committees give the most weight to. The most relevant sources of evidence imho really point in one direction but if you choose to follow the evidence given by sellouts then that is your prerogative.

So all confidence for natural is low and half confidence for lab leak is moderate

• low confidence in natural
• low to moderate confidence in lab leak
• ‘low to moderate’ > ‘low’

And that means intel agencies have more confidence in the lab leak so..

That ‘evidence’ is shoddy and outdated.

Besides, the government only just yesterday signed the declassification of origin information so we will have see for more.

Lmao literally though. “Oh the pathogen wildly variant from any naturally occurring viruses just happened to naturally appear in the very area that was developing bio weapons using that exact virus”

I would call it copium but I want to give more credit and call it ignorance

CIA, FBI, Committee on oversight and accountability

You can believe something based on what evidence shows is most likely the case. Which would be a lab leak in wuhan.

What else would shape that stuff? The magic conch?

There’s more than a little evidence

Most prestigious institutions agree that a lab leak in China was most likely the cause.

no? why would you think that.

So is indoctrination.

What an interesting looking graph. I have never seen anything like it. It does not appear to be highly intuitive. Certainly, creative though!

Can we get homicide rates vs gun ownership rates?